↓ Skip to main content

Expansion of discharge planning system in Japan: Comparison of results of a nationwide survey between 2001 and 2010

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Expansion of discharge planning system in Japan: Comparison of results of a nationwide survey between 2001 and 2010
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-237
Pubmed ID
Authors

Satoko Nagata, Hikari Tomura, Sachiyo Murashima

Abstract

In response to the rapid aging of the population in Japan, many care systems have been created in quick succession. Establishment of discharge planning departments (DPDs) in hospitals is one of them. In this study, we compared the distribution and characteristics of DPDs and the characteristics of the hospitals that have DPDs between 2001 and 2010 in Japan.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 23%
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 19 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 28%
Psychology 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 15 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2012.
All research outputs
#15,248,503
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,521
of 7,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,539
of 164,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#88
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.