You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-12-111 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joel J Gagnier, David Moher, Heather Boon, Joseph Beyene, Claire Bombardier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 226 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 22% |
| Researcher | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 39 | 17% |
| Unknown | 47 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 34 | 15% |
| Unknown | 60 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,700,145
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#736
of 2,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,594
of 182,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#6
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.