You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Heme arginate improves reperfusion patterns after ischemia: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in healthy male subjects
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-14-55 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Martin Andreas, Albrecht Ingo Schmid, Daniel Doberer, Kiril Schewzow, Stefan Weisshaar, Georg Heinze, Martin Bilban, Ewald Moser, Michael Wolzt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Austria | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 51 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 17% |
Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 17 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 40% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Psychology | 2 | 4% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 20 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2012.
All research outputs
#23,069,091
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,293
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,434
of 179,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.