↓ Skip to main content

Physicians in private practice: reasons for being a social franchise member

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physicians in private practice: reasons for being a social franchise member
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1478-4505-10-25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dale Huntington, Gary Mundy, Nang Mo Hom, Qingfeng Li, Tin Aung

Abstract

Evidence is emerging on the cost-effectiveness, quality and health coverage of social franchises. But little is known about the motivations of providers to join or remain within a social franchise network, or the impact that franchise membership has on client volumes or revenue earnings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 2%
India 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Puerto Rico 1 1%
Unknown 88 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Researcher 13 14%
Other 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 18 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 29%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 15%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 19 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2012.
All research outputs
#7,797,262
of 24,452,844 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#882
of 1,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,975
of 167,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,452,844 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,311 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.