You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The clinical relevance of assessing advanced glycation endproducts accumulation in diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cardiovascular Diabetology, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2840-7-29 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robbert Meerwaldt, Thera Links, Clark Zeebregts, Rene Tio, Jan-Luuk Hillebrands, Andries Smit |
| Abstract |
Cardiovascular disease is the major cause of morbidity and mortality associated with diabetes. There is increasing evidence that advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) play a pivotal role in atherosclerosis, in particular in diabetes. AGE accumulation is a measure of cumulative metabolic and oxidative stress, and may so represent the "metabolic memory". Furthermore, increased AGE accumulation is closely related to the development of cardiovascular complications in diabetes. This review article will focus on the clinical relevance of measuring AGE accumulation in diabetic patients by focusing on AGE formation, AGEs as predictors of long-term complications, and interventions against AGEs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Estonia | 1 | <1% |
| El Salvador | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 148 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 22% |
| Unknown | 25 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 8% |
| Engineering | 8 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 17% |
| Unknown | 31 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2018.
All research outputs
#14,387,928
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#748
of 1,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,009
of 102,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.