You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparison of two treatments for childhood apraxia of speech: methods and treatment protocol for a parallel group randomised control trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2431-12-112 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth Murray, Patricia McCabe, Kirrie J Ballard |
| Abstract |
Childhood Apraxia of Speech is an impairment of speech motor planning that manifests as difficulty producing the sounds (articulation) and melody (prosody) of speech. These difficulties may persist through life and are detrimental to academic, social, and vocational development. A number of published single subject and case series studies of speech treatments are available. There are currently no randomised control trials or other well designed group trials available to guide clinical practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 25% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 187 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 64 | 34% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Researcher | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 40 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 15% |
| Linguistics | 22 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 8% |
| Psychology | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 50 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2016.
All research outputs
#2,160,593
of 25,393,455 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#271
of 3,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,563
of 179,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#12
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,393,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.