You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of community tracer teams on treatment outcomes among tuberculosis patients in South Africa
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-621 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Liza E Bronner, Laura J Podewils, Annatjie Peters, Pushpakanthi Somnath, Lorna Nshuti, Martie van der Walt, Lerole David Mametja |
Abstract |
Tuberculosis (TB) indicators in South Africa currently remain well below global targets. In 2008, the National Tuberculosis Program (NTP) implemented a community mobilization program in all nine provinces to trace TB patients that had missed a treatment or clinic visit. Implementation sites were selected by TB program managers and teams liaised with health facilities to identify patients for tracing activities. The objective of this analysis was to assess the impact of the TB Tracer Project on treatment outcomes among TB patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 93 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 24 | 25% |
Researcher | 21 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
Other | 14 | 14% |
Unknown | 17 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 37% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Unknown | 20 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,099,044
of 23,671,454 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,335
of 15,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,557
of 167,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#129
of 326 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,671,454 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 326 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.