↓ Skip to main content

Sexual behaviour and risk factors for the acquisition of human papillomavirus infections in young people in Italy: suggestions for future vaccination policies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sexual behaviour and risk factors for the acquisition of human papillomavirus infections in young people in Italy: suggestions for future vaccination policies
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-623
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donatella Panatto, Daniela Amicizia, Cecilia Trucchi, Francesca Casabona, Piero Luigi Lai, Paolo Bonanni, Sara Boccalini, Angela Bechini, Emilia Tiscione, Carla Maria Zotti, Rosa Cristina Coppola, Giuseppina Masia, Angelo Meloni, Paolo Castiglia, Andrea Piana, Roberto Gasparini

Abstract

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection. The main risk factors correlated with HPV infection are: early sexual debut, the number of partners, frequency and type of sexual contact and partner's sexual histories.We surveyed sexual habits among young people in order to provide information that might orient decision-makers in adopting HPV multi-cohort vaccination policies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 133 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 39 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 6%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 41 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2012.
All research outputs
#13,365,440
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,464
of 14,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,217
of 166,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#186
of 325 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 325 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.