The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Psychosocial group intervention to enhance self-management skills of people with dementia and their caregivers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-13-133 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marja-Liisa Laakkonen, Eeva H Hölttä, Niina Savikko, Timo E Strandberg, Merja Suominen, Kaisu H Pitkälä |
| Abstract |
After diagnosis of a dementing illness, patients and their spouses have many concerns related to the disease and their future. This often leads to poor psychological well-being and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of the family. Support for self-management skills has been proven to be an effective method to improve prognosis of asthma, heart failure and osteoarthritis. However, self-management interventions have not been studied in dementia. Therefore, our aim was to examine, in an objective-oriented group intervention, the efficacy of self-management support program (SMP) on the HRQoL of dementia patients and their spousal caregivers as well as on the sense of competence and psychological well-being of caregivers. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 335 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 57 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 15% |
| Researcher | 46 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 8% |
| Other | 48 | 14% |
| Unknown | 83 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 67 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 36 | 11% |
| Unknown | 99 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,173,651
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#14
of 45 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,595
of 185,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#18
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one scored the same or higher as 31 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.