↓ Skip to main content

Chest sonography: a useful tool to differentiate acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema from acute respiratory distress syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Ultrasound, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 330)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
43 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
451 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
471 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chest sonography: a useful tool to differentiate acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema from acute respiratory distress syndrome
Published in
Cardiovascular Ultrasound, April 2008
DOI 10.1186/1476-7120-6-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberto Copetti, Gino Soldati, Paolo Copetti

Abstract

Differential diagnosis between acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (APE) and acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS) may often be difficult. We evaluated the ability of chest sonography in the identification of characteristic pleuropulmonary signs useful in the diagnosis of ALI/ARDS and APE.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 471 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 463 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 67 14%
Other 59 13%
Student > Postgraduate 50 11%
Student > Bachelor 36 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 7%
Other 119 25%
Unknown 106 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 308 65%
Engineering 9 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 1%
Other 14 3%
Unknown 117 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,367,636
of 25,820,938 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Ultrasound
#9
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,934
of 90,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Ultrasound
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,820,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them