You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Widespread disruptive selection in the wild is associated with intense resource competition
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-12-136 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ryan A Martin, David W Pfennig |
Abstract |
Disruptive selection has been documented in a growing number of natural populations. Yet, its prevalence within individual systems remains unclear. Furthermore, few studies have sought to identify the ecological factors that promote disruptive selection in the wild. To address these issues, we surveyed 15 populations of Mexican spadefoot toad tadpoles, Spea multiplicata, and measured the prevalence of disruptive selection acting on resource-use phenotypes. We also evaluated the relationship between the strength of disruptive selection and the intensity of intraspecific competition-an ecological agent hypothesized to be an important driver of disruptive selection. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 5% |
Chile | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 61 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 24% |
Researcher | 9 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 14% |
Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 11% |
Other | 9 | 14% |
Unknown | 7 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 68% |
Environmental Science | 9 | 14% |
Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2021.
All research outputs
#6,753,656
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,503
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,577
of 179,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#24
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.