You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus non-invasive ventilation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients after extubation: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03214-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dingyu Tan, Joseph Harold Walline, Bingyu Ling, Yan Xu, Jiayan Sun, Bingxia Wang, Xueqin Shan, Yunyun Wang, Peng Cao, Qingcheng Zhu, Ping Geng, Jun Xu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 6 | 15% |
| Spain | 3 | 8% |
| Mexico | 3 | 8% |
| Grenada | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 21 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 159 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Researcher | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 69 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 9% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 72 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,159,487
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#955
of 6,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,918
of 427,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#39
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.