You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Using creative co-design to develop a decision support tool for people with malignant pleural effusion
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12911-020-01200-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cheryl Grindell, Angela Tod, Remi Bec, Daniel Wolstenholme, Rahul Bhatnagar, Parthipan Sivakumar, Anna Morley, Jayne Holme, Judith Lyons, Maryam Ahmed, Susan Jackson, Deirdre Wallace, Farinaz Noorzad, Meera Kamalanathan, Liju Ahmed, Mathew Evison |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 44% |
United States | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Members of the public | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 20 | 25% |
Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
Researcher | 5 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 25 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 20 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Psychology | 3 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 16% |
Unknown | 25 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,301,020
of 23,228,787 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#151
of 2,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,182
of 398,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#3
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,228,787 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,020 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.