| Title |
Technology versus tradition: a non-inferiority trial comparing video to face-to-face consultations with a physiotherapist for people with knee osteoarthritis. Protocol for the PEAK randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12891-020-03523-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rana S. Hinman, Alexander J. Kimp, Penny K. Campbell, Trevor Russell, Nadine E. Foster, Jessica Kasza, Anthony Harris, Kim L. Bennell |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 8 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 70% |
| Scientists | 6 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 216 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 19% |
| Unknown | 93 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Unknown | 95 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,307,386
of 23,996,152 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#233
of 4,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,885
of 401,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#9
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,996,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.