↓ Skip to main content

Acceptance patterns and decision-making for human papillomavirus vaccination among parents in Vietnam: an in-depth qualitative study post-vaccination

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acceptance patterns and decision-making for human papillomavirus vaccination among parents in Vietnam: an in-depth qualitative study post-vaccination
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-629
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane K Cover, Nguyen Quy Nghi, D Scott LaMontagne, Dang Thi Thanh Huyen, Nguyen Tran Hien, Le Thi Nga

Abstract

The GAVI Alliance's decision in late 2011 to invite developing countries to apply for funding for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine introduction underscores the importance of understanding levels of HPV vaccine acceptance in developing country settings. In this paper, we present findings from qualitative research on parents' rationales for vaccinating or not vaccinating their daughters (vaccine acceptance) and their decision-making process in the context of an HPV vaccination demonstration project in Vietnam (2008-2009).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 114 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 29 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 12%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Psychology 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 35 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,248,739
of 24,620,470 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,327
of 16,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,443
of 172,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#104
of 331 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,620,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 331 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.