You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Surviving in steep terrain: a lab-to-field assessment of locomotor costs for wild mountain lions (Puma concolor)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Movement Ecology, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40462-020-00215-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carolyn E. Dunford, Nikki J. Marks, Christopher C. Wilmers, Caleb M. Bryce, Barry Nickel, Lisa L. Wolfe, D. Michael Scantlebury, Terrie M. Williams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 29% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 2% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Papua New Guinea | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 20 | 49% |
| Members of the public | 19 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 23% |
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 21% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2021.
All research outputs
#520,532
of 24,034,335 outputs
Outputs from Movement Ecology
#19
of 341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,109
of 401,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Movement Ecology
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,034,335 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.