↓ Skip to main content

How healthcare professionals respond to parents with religious objections to vaccination: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How healthcare professionals respond to parents with religious objections to vaccination: a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-231
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wilhelmina LM Ruijs, Jeannine LA Hautvast, Giovanna van IJzendoorn, Wilke JC van Ansem, Glyn Elwyn, Koos van der Velden, Marlies EJL Hulscher

Abstract

In recent years healthcare professionals have faced increasing concerns about the value of childhood vaccination and many find it difficult to deal with parents who object to vaccination. In general, healthcare professionals are advised to listen respectfully to the objections of parents, provide honest information, and attempt to correct any misperceptions regarding vaccination. Religious objections are one of the possible reasons for refusing vaccination. Although religious objections have a long history, little is known about the way healthcare professionals deal with these specific objections. The aim of this study is to gain insight into the responding of healthcare professionals to parents with religious objections to the vaccination of their children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 165 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Master 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Other 38 22%
Unknown 43 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 31%
Social Sciences 19 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 10%
Psychology 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 47 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,031,571
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,844
of 7,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,225
of 164,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#14
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.