↓ Skip to main content

Read mapping on de Bruijn graphs

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
56 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Read mapping on de Bruijn graphs
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12859-016-1103-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antoine Limasset, Bastien Cazaux, Eric Rivals, Pierre Peterlongo

Abstract

Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) has dramatically enhanced our ability to sequence genomes, but not to assemble them. In practice, many published genome sequences remain in the state of a large set of contigs. Each contig describes the sequence found along some path of the assembly graph, however, the set of contigs does not record all the sequence information contained in that graph. Although many subsequent analyses can be performed with the set of contigs, one may ask whether mapping reads on the contigs is as informative as mapping them on the paths of the assembly graph. Currently, one lacks practical tools to perform mapping on such graphs. Here, we propose a formal definition of mapping on a de Bruijn graph, analyse the problem complexity which turns out to be NP-complete, and provide a practical solution. We propose a pipeline called GGMAP (Greedy Graph MAPping). Its novelty is a procedure to map reads on branching paths of the graph, for which we designed a heuristic algorithm called BGREAT (de Bruijn Graph REAd mapping Tool). For the sake of efficiency, BGREAT rewrites a read sequence as a succession of unitigs sequences. GGMAP can map millions of reads per CPU hour on a de Bruijn graph built from a large set of human genomic reads. Surprisingly, results show that up to 22 % more reads can be mapped on the graph but not on the contig set. Although mapping reads on a de Bruijn graph is complex task, our proposal offers a practical solution combining efficiency with an improved mapping capacity compared to assembly-based mapping even for complex eukaryotic data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
France 2 1%
Norway 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 127 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 25%
Researcher 34 24%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Master 11 8%
Other 10 7%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 40 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 22%
Engineering 4 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 22 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,007,389
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#75
of 7,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,408
of 359,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#1
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.