↓ Skip to main content

Bench-to-bedside review: Quorum sensing and the role of cell-to-cell communication during invasive bacterial infection

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bench-to-bedside review: Quorum sensing and the role of cell-to-cell communication during invasive bacterial infection
Published in
Critical Care, November 2008
DOI 10.1186/cc7101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shadaba Asad, Steven M Opal

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 178 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 18%
Student > Master 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 39 21%
Unknown 29 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 5%
Engineering 7 4%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 33 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2015.
All research outputs
#6,332,683
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,630
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,574
of 178,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#9
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.