Title |
Hemofiltration or hemodialysis for acute kidney injury?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc11450 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Achim Jörres |
Abstract |
ABSTRACT: The optimal choice of modality for acute renal replacement therapy is unclear at present. Diffusive therapy (hemodialysis) removes small solutes mainly, whereas convective therapies (hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration) may also eliminate larger molecules such as myoglobin or cytokines. Conversely, convective therapies might predispose patients to filter clotting and thus increased costs. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials could not find evidence for clinical benefits of either modality. Thus, the decision on renal replacement therapy modality still is based on the clinical status of the individual patient, the expertise of the medical and nursing staff, and local circumstances and availability. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 32 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 24% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 18% |
Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Unknown | 7 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 35% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 12% |
Chemical Engineering | 3 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 18% |