| Title |
A four-step strategy for handling missing outcome data in randomised trials affected by a pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-020-01089-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suzie Cro, Tim P. Morris, Brennan C. Kahan, Victoria R. Cornelius, James R. Carpenter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 48% |
| Australia | 3 | 8% |
| Philippines | 1 | 3% |
| Botswana | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Egypt | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 65% |
| Scientists | 9 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 21% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 5 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 21% |
| Unknown | 26 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,512,875
of 25,330,051 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#177
of 2,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,002
of 405,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#6
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,330,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.