You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
EFFECT: a randomized phase II study of efficacy and impact on function of two doses of nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment in older women with advanced breast cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Breast Cancer Research, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13058-020-01319-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Biganzoli, Saverio Cinieri, Rossana Berardi, Rebecca Pedersini, Amelia McCartney, Alessandro Marco Minisini, Elena Rota Caremoli, Simon Spazzapan, Emanuela Magnolfi, Antonella Brunello, Emanuela Risi, Raffaella Palumbo, Silvana Leo, Marco Colleoni, Sara Donati, Sabino De Placido, Laura Orlando, Mirco Pistelli, Veronica Parolin, Anna Mislang, Dimitri Becheri, Fabio Puglisi, Giuseppina Sanna, Elena Zafarana, Luca Boni, Giuseppe Mottino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Japan | 1 | 10% |
| Belgium | 1 | 10% |
| Mexico | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 25 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2020.
All research outputs
#6,415,188
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#735
of 2,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,003
of 426,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#11
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.