You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparing supermarket loyalty card data with traditional diet survey data for understanding how protein is purchased and consumed in older adults for the UK, 2014–16
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12937-020-00602-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mark A. Green, Anthony W. Watson, Jeffrey M. Brunstrom, Bernard M. Corfe, Alexandra M. Johnstone, Elizabeth A. Williams, Emma Stevenson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 9 | 75% |
Belgium | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 5 | 42% |
Members of the public | 4 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 18% |
Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Researcher | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 16 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 4 | 12% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 15% |
Unknown | 17 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,906,497
of 23,393,453 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#699
of 1,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,790
of 399,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#14
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,393,453 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.