↓ Skip to main content

Polymorphisms in the genes coding for iron binding and transporting proteins are associated with disability, severity, and early progression in multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Genomics, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
12 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Polymorphisms in the genes coding for iron binding and transporting proteins are associated with disability, severity, and early progression in multiple sclerosis
Published in
BMC Medical Genomics, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2350-13-70
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donato Gemmati, Giulia Zeri, Elisa Orioli, Francesca E De Gaetano, Fabrizio Salvi, Ilaria Bartolomei, Sandra D’Alfonso, Claudia Dall’Osso, Maurizio A Leone, Ajay V Singh, Rosanna Asselta, Paolo Zamboni

Abstract

Iron involvement/imbalance is strongly suspected in multiple sclerosis (MS) etiopathogenesis, but its role is quite debated. Iron deposits encircle the veins in brain MS lesions, increasing local metal concentrations in brain parenchyma as documented by magnetic resonance imaging and histochemical studies. Conversely, systemic iron overload is not always observed. We explored the role of common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the main iron homeostasis genes in MS patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Ghana 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Other 6 10%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 14%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 8 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2017.
All research outputs
#2,264,349
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#94
of 2,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,517
of 185,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#3
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,448 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.