You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Professional training on shared decision making with older adults living with neurocognitive disorders: a mixed-methods implementation study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-020-01197-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Moulikatou Adouni Lawani, Luc Côté, Laetitia Coudert, Michèle Morin, Holly O. Witteman, Danielle Caron, Edeltraut Kroger, Philippe Voyer, Charo Rodriguez, France Légaré, Anik M. C. Giguere |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 38% |
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Librarian | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 32 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 37 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,233,306
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#555
of 2,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,787
of 400,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#14
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,027 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.