| Title |
Impact of two-level filtering on emergency medical communication center triage during the COVID-19 pandemic: an uncontrolled before-after study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13049-020-00775-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Y. Penverne, B. Leclere, J. Labady, F. Berthier, J. Jenvrin, F. Javaudin, E. Montassier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 10 | 40% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Saint Martin (French part) | 1 | 4% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 84% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Librarian | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,856,913
of 25,186,033 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#160
of 1,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,227
of 404,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#5
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,186,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.