You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Early childhood education and care-based healthy eating interventions for improving child diet: a systematic review protocol
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13643-020-01440-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jacklyn Jackson, Luke Wolfenden, Alice Grady, Melanie Lum, Alecia Leonard, Sam McCrabb, Alix Hall, Nicole Pearson, Courtney Barnes, Sze Lin Yoong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 17% |
Australia | 2 | 17% |
Ireland | 2 | 17% |
France | 1 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
Researcher | 7 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Other | 15 | 16% |
Unknown | 36 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 8% |
Unspecified | 6 | 7% |
Psychology | 4 | 4% |
Other | 16 | 18% |
Unknown | 37 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,184,265
of 24,307,517 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#363
of 2,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,796
of 402,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#13
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,307,517 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.