You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Barriers and facilitators of kangaroo mother care adoption in five Chinese hospitals: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-020-09337-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jieya Yue, Jun Liu, Sarah Williams, Bo Zhang, Yingxi Zhao, Qiannan Zhang, Lin Zhang, Xin Liu, Stephen Wall, Greta Wetzel, Gengli Zhao, Jennifer Bouey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 164 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
| Researcher | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 17% |
| Unknown | 76 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 10% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 75 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2020.
All research outputs
#14,574,633
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,587
of 15,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,318
of 399,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#188
of 292 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.