You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effects of exercise therapy in patients with acute low back pain: a systematic review of systematic reviews
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13643-020-01412-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marc Karlsson, Anna Bergenheim, Maria E. H. Larsson, Lena Nordeman, Maurits van Tulder, Susanne Bernhardsson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 146 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 17 | 12% |
United States | 14 | 10% |
Australia | 9 | 6% |
Spain | 8 | 5% |
Canada | 8 | 5% |
Germany | 4 | 3% |
Saudi Arabia | 4 | 3% |
Mexico | 4 | 3% |
Belgium | 3 | 2% |
Other | 21 | 14% |
Unknown | 54 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 115 | 79% |
Scientists | 19 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 248 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 30 | 12% |
Student > Master | 24 | 10% |
Other | 19 | 8% |
Researcher | 10 | 4% |
Lecturer | 8 | 3% |
Other | 36 | 15% |
Unknown | 121 | 49% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 16% |
Sports and Recreations | 14 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 9 | 4% |
Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
Other | 13 | 5% |
Unknown | 125 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2023.
All research outputs
#431,857
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#47
of 2,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,057
of 426,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#3
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.