| Title |
Inhaled nitric oxide in patients admitted to intensive care unit with COVID-19 pneumonia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03222-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guido Tavazzi, Marco Pozzi, Silvia Mongodi, Valentino Dammassa, Giovanni Romito, Francesco Mojoli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 9 | 16% |
| United States | 6 | 11% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Peru | 2 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 12% |
| Scientists | 5 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,081,885
of 25,820,938 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#843
of 6,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,385
of 428,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#34
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,820,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.