You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Performance of the BD FACSPresto near to patient analyzer in comparison with representative conventional CD4 instruments in Cameroon
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
AIDS Research and Therapy, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12981-020-00309-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bertrand Sagnia, Fabrice Mbakop Ghomsi, Ana Gutierrez, Samuel Sosso, Rachel Kamgaing, Aubin Joseph Nanfack, Nadesh Nji, Georgia Ambada, Abel Lissom, Thibaut Flaurant Tchouangueu, Loveline Ngu Ndengkoh, Irenée Domkam, Godwin Nchinda, Alexis Ndjolo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 32% |
| Researcher | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,820,750
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from AIDS Research and Therapy
#102
of 574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,076
of 400,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS Research and Therapy
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.