↓ Skip to main content

Hallmarks of human “immunosenescence”: adaptation or dysregulation?

Overview of attention for article published in Immunity & Ageing, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
196 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hallmarks of human “immunosenescence”: adaptation or dysregulation?
Published in
Immunity & Ageing, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1742-4933-9-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Graham Pawelec

Abstract

Is immunosenescence an intrinsic ageing process leading to dysregulation of immunity or an adaptive response of the individual to pathogen exposure? Age-associated differences in bone marrow immune cell output and thymic involution suggest the former. Accepted hallmarks of immunosenescence (decreased numbers and percentages of peripheral naïve T cells, especially CD8 + cells, and accumulations of memory T cells, especially late-stage differentiated CD8+ cells) suggest the latter, viewed as the result of depletion of the reservoir of naïve cells over time by contact with pathogens and their conversion to memory cells, the basis of adaptive immunity. Thymic involution beginning early in life limits the generation of naive cells such that the adult is believed to rely to a great extent on the naïve cell pool produced mostly before puberty. Thus, these hallmarks of immunosenescence would be markedly affected by the history of the individual´s exposure to pathogens. It would be predicted that in modern industrialized populations, the cumulative effects of antigenic "stressors" would be lower than in less hygienic societies, whereas intrinsic processes might be more similar in different populations. Identifying such stressors and taking steps to nullify their impact could therefore result in delayed immunosenescence and contribute significantly to improving public health. Here, I discuss some of the available data bearing on this prediction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 123 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 41 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 44 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,224,703
of 25,834,578 outputs
Outputs from Immunity & Ageing
#66
of 453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,577
of 179,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunity & Ageing
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,834,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them