↓ Skip to main content

Knowledge, attitudes and practices of young adults towards HIV prevention: an analysis of baseline data from a community-based HIV prevention intervention study in two high HIV burden districts…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Knowledge, attitudes and practices of young adults towards HIV prevention: an analysis of baseline data from a community-based HIV prevention intervention study in two high HIV burden districts, South Africa
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12889-020-09356-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simukai Shamu, Sikhulile Khupakonke, Thato Farirai, Jean Slabbert, Thato Chidarikire, Geoffrey Guloba, Nkhensani Nkhwashu

Abstract

With an HIV incidence of 1.00 skewed against women (1.51), adolescents in South Africa are at high HIV risk. This paper assesses young adults' (18-24 years) knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding HIV prevention in Nkangala and OR Tambo districts. A cross-sectional household survey was conducted in two districts in 2017/8. Participants completed computer-assisted self-interviews on HIV knowledge, attitudes, behaviour practices, use of social media and condom use at last sex (proxy for high-risk sex). HIV knowledge was assessed using the South African-adapted UNAIDS scale. Descriptive analyses were conducted and logistic regression models were built to assess factors associated with being knowledgeable of HIV and condom use at last sex. One thousand nine hundred fifty-five participants were interviewed (90% response rate). Less than half (44.7%) had correct knowledge of HIV prevention and 73% used a condom at last sex. Social media use predicted high HIV knowledge as higher odds were observed among participants using the print media (aOR1.87; 1.34-2.60), WhatsApp (aOR1.55; 1.26-1.90), radio/television (aOR2.75; 1.15-6.55) although social networking sites' use protected against knowledge acquisition (aOR0.53; 0.34-0.82). Females (aOR0.75; 0.58-0.97) and participants reporting sexual risk were less likely to have HIV knowledge as negative associations were found for having multiple sexual partners in the last 3 months (aOR0.63;0.48-0.82) and ever having sex (aOR0.37;0.23-0.61). Participants who abused drugs (aOR1.40; 1.05-1.88) and had attitudes accepting people living with HIV (aOR2.05; 1.14-3.69) had higher odds of having HIV knowledge. Females (aOR0.70; 0.54-0.91), students (aOR0.52; 0.40-0.66) and participants who abused drugs (aOR0.58; 0.43-0.77) were less likely to report condom use at last sex. There is a correlation between media use and HIV knowledge, non-condom use and HIV knowledge, and high-risk sexual behaviours and less HIV knowledge. An aggressive community media campaign utilising locally available, preferred and accessible media platforms among young adults is required for behaviour change.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 225 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 14%
Student > Bachelor 31 14%
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 7%
Other 11 5%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 100 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 38 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 11%
Social Sciences 23 10%
Psychology 12 5%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 104 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2020.
All research outputs
#20,637,315
of 23,230,825 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#14,174
of 15,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#342,148
of 400,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#250
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,230,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.