↓ Skip to main content

ACHESS – The Australian study of child health in same-sex families: background research, design and methodology

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
31 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ACHESS – The Australian study of child health in same-sex families: background research, design and methodology
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-646
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon Robert Crouch, Elizabeth Waters, Ruth McNair, Jennifer Power, Elise Davis

Abstract

There are an increasing number of children in Australia growing up with same-sex attracted parents. Although children from same-sex parent families do in general perform well on many psychosocial measures recent research is beginning to consider some small but significant differences when these children are compared with children from other family backgrounds. In particular studies suggest that there is an association between the stigma that same-sex parent families experience and child wellbeing. Research to date lacks a holistic view with the complete physical, mental and social wellbeing of children not yet addressed. In addition, most studies have focused only on families with lesbian parents and have studied only small numbers of children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 91 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 19%
Student > Bachelor 17 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 15%
Social Sciences 14 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 21 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2023.
All research outputs
#533,947
of 25,846,867 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#512
of 17,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,648
of 186,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#6
of 338 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,846,867 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 338 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.