| Title |
Improving the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19: examining the factors that influence engagement and the impact on individuals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12879-020-05340-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Holly Seale, Clare E. F. Dyer, Ikram Abdi, Kazi M. Rahman, Yanni Sun, Mohammed O. Qureshi, Alexander Dowell-Day, Jonathon Sward, M. Saiful Islam |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 8 | 42% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 16% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 53% |
| Scientists | 7 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 335 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 335 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 11% |
| Researcher | 37 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 59 | 18% |
| Unknown | 110 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 11% |
| Psychology | 17 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 65 | 19% |
| Unknown | 123 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 158. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2022.
All research outputs
#265,842
of 25,844,183 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#69
of 8,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,228
of 428,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,844,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.