You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
In Defence of informed consent for health record research - why arguments from ‘easy rescue’, ‘no harm’ and ‘consent bias’ fail
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12910-020-00519-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thomas Ploug |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 14% |
Unknown | 21 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 14% |
Computer Science | 4 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 24 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,454,639
of 24,598,501 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#370
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,391
of 405,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#13
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,598,501 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.