Title |
In vitro potency of amikacin and comparators against E. coli, K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa respiratory and blood isolates
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12941-016-0155-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christina A. Sutherland, Jamie E. Verastegui, David P. Nicolau, Sutherland, Christina A, Verastegui, Jamie E, Nicolau, David P |
Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to define the potency of amikacin and comparator agents against a collection of blood and respiratory nosocomial isolates implicated in ICU based pulmonary infections gathered from US hospitals. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of amikacin, aztreonam, cefepime, ceftazidime, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam and tobramycin were tested against 2460 Gram-negative isolates. Amikacin had 96 % susceptibility against the combined E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates and 95 % susceptibility against P. aeruginosa. Ninety-six percent of all of isolates tested were susceptible (i.e., MICs ≤16 mg/L) to amikacin by current laboratory standards which demonstrates a high level of activity to combat infections caused by these organisms including ESBL, MDR, β-lactam and fluoroquinolone resistant strains. Moreover, 99 % of all organisms had amikacin MICs ≤64 mg/L. Overall, these data highlight the continued potency of amikacin and suggest that the achievable lung concentrations of approximately 5000 mg/L with the administration of the amikacin by inhalation (Amikacin Inhale, BAY41-6551) will exceed the MICs typically observed for P. aeruginosa, E. coli and K. pneumoniae in the hospital setting. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 25% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 19% |
Researcher | 7 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 14% |
Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 24% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 12% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 14% |
Unknown | 11 | 26% |