You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The trabecula septomarginalis (Leonardo’s cord) in abnormal ventriculo-arterial connections: anatomic and morphogenetic implications
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1749-8090-9-71 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Athos Capuani |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Egypt | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 36% |
Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 82% |
Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,508,624
of 23,232,430 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#22
of 1,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,321
of 227,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,232,430 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,260 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.