↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neuroscience, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
BMC Neuroscience, January 2005
DOI 10.1186/1471-2202-6-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

David C Airey, Alicia I Robbins, Katherine M Enzinger, Fangbai Wu, Christine E Collins

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 7%
United States 2 7%
Unknown 26 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 13%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 60%
Neuroscience 7 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Unknown 3 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#13,584,436
of 17,033,237 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#797
of 1,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,597
of 305,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,033,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,128 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them