↓ Skip to main content

Tracing the expression of circular RNAs in human pre-implantation embryos

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tracing the expression of circular RNAs in human pre-implantation embryos
Published in
Genome Biology, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13059-016-0991-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yujiao Dang, Liying Yan, Boqiang Hu, Xiaoying Fan, Yixin Ren, Rong Li, Ying Lian, Jie Yan, Qingqing Li, Yan Zhang, Min Li, Xiulian Ren, Jin Huang, Yuqi Wu, Ping Liu, Lu Wen, Chen Zhang, Yanyi Huang, Fuchou Tang, Jie Qiao

Abstract

PolyA- RNAs have not been widely analyzed in human pre-implantation embryos due to the scarcity of materials. In particular, circular RNA (circRNA), a novel type of polyA- RNA, has not been characterized during human pre-implantation development. We systematically analyze polyA+ messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and polyA- RNAs in individual human oocytes and pre-implantation embryos using SUPeR-seq. We de novo identify 10,032 circRNAs from 2974 hosting genes. Most of these circRNAs are developmentally stage-specific and dynamically regulated. Many of them are maternally expressed, implying their potentially important regulatory functions in oogenesis and the formation of totipotent zygotes. Comparison between human and mouse embryos reveals both high conservation and clear distinction between these two species. Human pre-implantation embryos generate more types of circRNA compared with mouse embryos and this is associated with a striking increase of the length of the circRNA flanking introns in humans. We also perform RNA de novo assembly and identify novel transcript units, many of which are potentially novel long non-coding RNAs. This study reports the first analysis of the whole transcriptome comprising both polyA+ mRNAs and polyA- RNAs including circRNAs during human pre-implantation development. It provides an invaluable resource for analyzing the unique function and complex regulatory mechanisms of circRNAs during this process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Brazil 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 173 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 18%
Student > Master 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 34 19%
Unknown 36 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 58 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 7%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 41 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,589,736
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,472
of 4,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,279
of 368,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#49
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.