You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review of the effectiveness of alternative cadres in community based rehabilitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Resources for Health, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4491-10-20 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hasheem Mannan, Camille Boostrom, Malcolm MacLachlan, Eilish McAuliffe, Chapal Khasnabis, Neeru Gupta |
| Abstract |
The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) aim to improve population health and the quality and dignity of people's lives, but their achievement is constrained by the crisis in human resources for health. An important potential contribution towards achieving the MDGs for persons with disabilities will be the newly developed Guidelines for Community Based Rehabilitation (CBR), launched in 2010. Given the global shortage of medical and nursing personnel and highly skilled rehabilitation practitioners, effective implementation of the CBR guidelines will require additional health workers, with improved distribution and a new skill set, allowing them to work across the health, education, livelihoods, social, and development sectors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 27% |
| Unknown | 25 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 25 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2012.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#1,223
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,259
of 185,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#26
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.