↓ Skip to main content

Ventilatory and ECMO treatment of H1N1-induced severe respiratory failure: results of an Italian referral ECMO center

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ventilatory and ECMO treatment of H1N1-induced severe respiratory failure: results of an Italian referral ECMO center
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2466-11-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanni Cianchi, Manuela Bonizzoli, Andrea Pasquini, Massimo Bonacchi, Giovanni Zagli, Marco Ciapetti, Guido Sani, Stefano Batacchi, Simona Biondi, Pasquale Bernardo, Chiara Lazzeri, Valtere Giovannini, Alberta Azzi, Rosanna Abbate, Gianfranco Gensini, Adriano Peris

Abstract

Since the first outbreak of a respiratory illness caused by H1N1 virus in Mexico, several reports have described the need of intensive care or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) assistance in young and often healthy patients. Here we describe our experience in H1N1-induced ARDS using both ventilation strategy and ECMO assistance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 116 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 17%
Other 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Master 9 7%
Other 31 25%
Unknown 28 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 53%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Engineering 4 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 30 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,867,088
of 24,171,511 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#277
of 2,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,142
of 188,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,171,511 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.