You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Self-selected step length asymmetry is not explained by energy cost minimization in individuals with chronic stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-020-00733-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thu M. Nguyen, Rachel W. Jackson, Yashar Aucie, Digna de Kam, Steven H. Collins, Gelsy Torres-Oviedo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 42% |
| Canada | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 58% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 13 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,533,094
of 24,562,945 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#116
of 1,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,273
of 404,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#4
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,562,945 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.