You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A mixed methods approach to evaluating community drug distributor performance in the control of neglected tropical diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Parasites & Vectors, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13071-016-1606-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiona M. Fleming, Fred Matovu, Kristian S. Hansen, Joanne P. Webster |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Georgia | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 131 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 25% |
| Researcher | 21 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 18% |
| Unknown | 30 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 21% |
| Unknown | 38 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,602,410
of 24,580,204 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#504
of 5,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,268
of 332,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#19
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,580,204 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.