↓ Skip to main content

Succeeding with prolonged usage of consumer-based activity trackers in clinical studies: a mixed methods approach

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Succeeding with prolonged usage of consumer-based activity trackers in clinical studies: a mixed methods approach
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12889-020-09406-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

André Henriksen, Anne-Sofie Sand, Trygve Deraas, Sameline Grimsgaard, Gunnar Hartvigsen, Laila Hopstock

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 14%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 31 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Sports and Recreations 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 36 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2020.
All research outputs
#13,052,050
of 23,232,430 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,015
of 15,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,078
of 399,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#156
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,232,430 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.