↓ Skip to main content

Do-not-resuscitate orders, unintended consequences, and the ripple effect

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do-not-resuscitate orders, unintended consequences, and the ripple effect
Published in
Critical Care, March 2007
DOI 10.1186/cc5687
Pubmed ID
Authors

J Claude Hemphill

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 23%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Professor 3 9%
Other 11 31%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 71%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,262,445
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,317
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,868
of 90,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#16
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.