| Title |
Convalescent plasma for COVID-19: the risk of pulmonary embolism should not be underestimated!
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03236-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
F. Sanfilippo, V. La Rosa, F. Oliveri, M. Astuto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 25 | 33% |
| United States | 6 | 8% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 17% |
| Scientists | 10 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Librarian | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2020.
All research outputs
#950,081
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#720
of 6,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,116
of 426,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#24
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,604 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.