You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comprehensive analysis of diverse low-grade neuroepithelial tumors with FGFR1 alterations reveals a distinct molecular signature of rosette-forming glioneuronal tumor
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica Communications, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40478-020-01027-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Calixto-Hope G. Lucas, Rohit Gupta, Pamela Doo, Julieann C. Lee, Cathryn R. Cadwell, Biswarathan Ramani, Jeffrey W. Hofmann, Emily A. Sloan, Bette K. Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, Han S. Lee, Matthew D. Wood, Marjorie Grafe, Donald Born, Hannes Vogel, Shahriar Salamat, Diane Puccetti, David Scharnhorst, David Samuel, Tabitha Cooney, Elaine Cham, Lee-way Jin, Ziad Khatib, Ossama Maher, Gabriel Chamyan, Carole Brathwaite, Serguei Bannykh, Sabine Mueller, Cassie N. Kline, Anu Banerjee, Alyssa Reddy, Jennie W. Taylor, Jennifer L. Clarke, Nancy Ann Oberheim Bush, Nicholas Butowski, Nalin Gupta, Kurtis I. Auguste, Peter P. Sun, Jarod L. Roland, Corey Raffel, Manish K. Aghi, Philip Theodosopoulos, Edward Chang, Shawn Hervey-Jumper, Joanna J. Phillips, Melike Pekmezci, Andrew W. Bollen, Tarik Tihan, Susan Chang, Mitchel S. Berger, Arie Perry, David A. Solomon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| China | 1 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 19% |
| Researcher | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,746,052
of 23,232,430 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#492
of 1,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,637
of 398,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#41
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,232,430 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.