↓ Skip to main content

Impact of dropout of female volunteer community health workers: An exploration in Dhaka urban slums

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of dropout of female volunteer community health workers: An exploration in Dhaka urban slums
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-260
Pubmed ID
Authors

Khurshid Alam, Jahangir AM Khan, Damian G Walker

Abstract

The model of volunteer community health workers (CHWs) is a common approach to serving the poor communities in developing countries. BRAC, a large NGO in Bangladesh, is a pioneer in this area, has been using female CHWs as core workers in its community-based health programs since 1977. After 25 years of implementing of the CHW model in rural areas, BRAC has begun using female CHWs in urban slums through a community-based maternal health intervention. However, BRAC experiences high dropout rates among CHWs suggesting a need to better understand the impact of their dropout which would help to reduce dropout and increase program sustainability. The main objective of the study was to estimate impact of dropout of volunteer CHWs from both BRAC and community perspectives. Also, we estimated cost of possible strategies to reduce dropout and compared whether these costs were more or less than the costs borne by BRAC and the community.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 149 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 26%
Researcher 28 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 24 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 28%
Social Sciences 26 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 36 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,220,985
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,920
of 7,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,294
of 170,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#13
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.