You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Perceived stress and diet quality in women of reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-020-00609-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karim Khaled, Fotini Tsofliou, Vanora Hundley, Rebecca Helmreich, Orouba Almilaji |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 55% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 9% |
| Belgium | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 36% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 18% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 215 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 8% |
| Researcher | 9 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 12% |
| Unknown | 109 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 12% |
| Unknown | 111 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,474,842
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#688
of 1,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,426
of 426,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#14
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.